Active candidate share
Compare candidates showing meaningful recent activity with the total candidate records held in the ATS or CRM.
Recruitment databases often grow for years while sourcing behaviour barely changes. Measuring utilisation helps distinguish an operational asset from a passive archive.
Compare candidates showing meaningful recent activity with the total candidate records held in the ATS or CRM.
Check whether recruiters search and re-engage existing candidates before launching another external sourcing cycle.
Use this as a directional signal of how dependent delivery remains on continuously adding new candidates.
Measure whether recruiter hours spent sourcing fall as the internal database becomes more useful.
There is no single universal utilisation percentage that defines a healthy recruitment database. Different sectors, geographies, job families and agency models create different patterns of candidate activity.
A more useful approach is to monitor your own operating relationship between database size, recent activity, sourcing effort and placements. If the database keeps growing while external sourcing effort remains unchanged, the accumulated data may not be creating operational leverage.
Record count can rise because of historic applications, imports, duplicated profiles and inactive candidates. None of those automatically improve delivery. Search quality, structured data, recruiter adoption and re-engagement workflows determine whether the data can be reused.
A low utilisation signal can point to several different causes: poor searchability, weak data quality, low adoption, narrow historical candidate coverage or missing re-engagement processes. The correct fix depends on the bottleneck.
No candidate records or CVs are uploaded.